Mar 24 Fourth Friday/Films of Vision and Hope – Of the Sea, with filmmaker

The new documentary, Of The Sea, brings a local Santa Cruz angle to the challenges and opportunities of a fishing industry hoping to balance jobs and environmental sustainability. “The industry isn’t dying, it’s changing,” according to filmmaker Mischa Hedges, who will lead a Q&A session following the South Bay Premiere of the film at our March Fourth Friday.

Mischa adds, “Our main goal for the film is to reconnect people who eat seafood with the places and people who catch it, and hopefully get some conversations started about local seafood.”

Don’t miss this delicious opportunity to dive in and learn about our local fisheries and how dedicated folks are working to help them thrive, and to find out how you can help support them.

Co-sponsored by Slow Food South Bay

Friday March 24, 7:30-9:30pm
Fireside Room, Unitarian Universalist Church of Palo Alto,
505 E. Charleston, Palo Alto

of the sea.png

Citrus fun!

It was non-stop marmalade at the Fun with Citrus party. Many thanks to all who helped cut, squish, stir, and pour! And special thanks to chief chef Peter Ruddock for making it all happen.

Did you know that the processed citrus pith (the white part inside the peel) makes a lovely lotion?

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Videos of Resistance and Hope

It was a first for February Fourth Friday — an evening of short videos on the themes of resistance and hope. A handful of people responded to our crowdsourcing request for videos, and we included their suggestions, plus more.

Although the videos are available on the net, attendees enjoyed seeing them together as  window into that’s happening now and the creative and impassioned ways that people are responding.

Thanks to all for suggesting videos, to Eitan Fenson for compiling them for the evening, and to Rani Jaykumar for creating this YouTube playlist of all that we saw. Enjoy!

Peter Ruddock also send this article with some surprising background about the Lumber 84 ad.

And some pix…

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Hearth and Soul

hearth-and-soul2

The new Hearth and Soul met Feb 21, for meditation, a sharing circle, and expressions of gratitude.

The goal is to create a place where people can express ourselves and support each other in these challenging times. The group will evolve along with the interests and energy of the participants.

The current plan is to meet once per month on the 3rd Monday, 7-9pm. Venues will vary, so please check your Transition Palo Alto email (sign up for the emailing list if you haven’t at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/transition-palo-alto). You can also join the new Hearth and Soul google group, which we’ll use to share ideas and resources (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/tpa_soul).

hearth-and-soul-candles

There Oughta Be a Law – II

On Jan 13, 8 intrepid people met at Red Rock Coffee in Mountain View for a Policy Cafe, to consider the 6 policies (see this earlier post) which Transitioners had proposed to submit to Senator Jerry Hill’s There Oughta Be a Law contest in the name of Transition Palo Alto.  After the ingestion of many beverages and some serious discussion, it was decided to submit the proposal submitted by Paul Higgins, which proposes regulating homeless encampments in a manner that gives people who are homeless more of a chance at stability and recovery.  After applying some spit and polish, the following proposal was e-mailed to Senator Hill’s office.  (As of this writing, Feb 7, we have not heard back about the proposal.  Senators have until Feb 17 to submit bills for consideration.)

CONSTITUENT BILL IDEA CONTEST
13th SENATE DISTRICT

Name: Paul Higgins and Peter Ruddock for Transition Palo Alto

Transition Palo Alto is a citizens’ group dedicated to creating a strong local economy and a resilient community as a strategy to counter climate change and create a better life for all in Palo Alto and the surrounding area.

Providing Stability for the Homeless Community Act

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM THAT NEEDS A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION?

There oughta be a law: regulating homeless encampments. It is obvious that shelters and indoor living are not an immediate solution for every homeless person, given the diversity of mental illnesses, the lack of housing, and the safety issues with many shelters. There seems to be a ‘war on the homeless’ currently. Many recent laws criminalize homelessness, and every time an encampment springs up, police wait until it is well established and then tear it all down and clear it out- but to what end? Where are these people supposed to go? Usually the tenants simply move to another site. This game of whack-a-mole that cities seem to be playing with homeless encampments makes it much harder for mental health professionals and other homeless outreach/advocate professionals to treat and serve the homeless community. Outreach programs need stability to work and a managed encampment would provide that.

Certainly it is understandable that jurisdictions are uncomfortable with these encampments, as they generate citizen complaints and can become safety hazards.  But removal is, at best, a temporary solution, as the encampments will spring up again in some other location.  For the problem as a whole, forcing people to move every few months from illegal camp to illegal camp is counter-productive, making the process of (re)gaining a home virtually impossible for most.  We need to give people some stability if they are to have a chance at success.  Jurisdictions need to be empowered to create that stability.

WHAT’S YOUR SOLUTION? Please attach proposed language, if any. Be as detailed as possible, attaching extra sheets if needed.

We should enact a law that legalizes a regulated and managed homeless encampment. This could use vacant/blighted parcels, parks land, or other city or county land, and would include designated camping spots that service users would register for, and be monitored by community police or liaisons. This is what would make the living environment safer than a shelter (which often have insufficient oversight). The involvement of existing local organizations would be sought. Facilities such as trash cans, porta-potties, potable water fountains, showers, and sheet-mulched areas for camping would also be included (ecologically-sound options would be encouraged, such as composting and bioswales to process waste and grey-water, and a garden for service users to grow food). The site would also include mail boxes for service users and act as a drop off point for food bank bags. The area could be re-mulched periodically to maintain sanitary conditions.

The type of housing allowed would be diverse, as long as it was temporary.

While a sunset clause for a planned site is possible, a stipulation that all registered tenants be moved to a new location with equal/greater space/amenities or permanent housing.

This plan could fall under the purview of parks/public works/sheriff/health system, or more sensibly be a combined effort with some capacity/staff time given by each department. As mentioned local organizations would be sought to provide management and support.

A small fee could be charged to service users to offset management costs for the site. This could be 5-10% of income if the service user is on social security, or a few dollars in cash per day if not. In Berkeley, the city often charges a percentage of service users’ income to pay for an apartment.

The plan could function in multiple ways: it could outline a way that a plot can be used in a given way (letting organizations/depts come together organically to start a project); OR the plan could designate that a site(s) of given size be built and specify a budget, staff time from different departments, and make it happen; OR the plan could it take an existing encampment and get it ‘up to code’.

This law is not a solution to end homelessness in our communities. It is a temporary measure to allow people who are already sleeping on our streets somewhere safer to go than a park bench or alleyway. Rather than using the streets and parks for their human needs, this would provide a safer, more hygienic way to take care of those needs. Finally, it provides dignity and a sense of self determination for people who are living on the streets by allowing them to use what ever type of housing or non-housing they wish- in a designated, managed space.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Please include any studies, reports, newspaper articles, personal experience, or anecdotal evidence relating to your proposal.

List of articles/resources (California):

Thesis on Community Development as Solution to Homelessness: http://digitalcommons.salve.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=pell_theses

San Jose city plans to use ‘jungle clean-up’ as model for dealing with homeless encampments: http://www.sanjoseinside.com/2015/03/30/city-to-use-jungle-cleanup-as-model-for-other-homeless-camps/

General information about homeless encampments:
http://www.popcenter.org/problems/homeless_encampments/3

http://www.popcenter.org/problems/homeless_encampments/print/

Homeless Person’s Bill of Rights Draft:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB5

SF in-depth look at policies and ‘Division St. Encampment’:

http://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/just-in/2016-03-14/division-street-debacle-nothing-else-works-why-not-legalize

Fact sheets:

http://cchealth.org/homeless/council/pdf/Annual-Report-FY-2015-2016.pdf

http://www.berkeleyside.com/2016/06/29/homelessness-in-berkeley-the-fact-sheet/

Other States:

Nashville, Tennesee exploratory meetings on the issue: http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/davidson%20/2015/09/29/city-leaders-study-idea-legal-homeless-camp/73040856/

Washington DC homeless criminalization:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/residents-of-dc-homeless-camp-distressed-as-city-moves-to-clear-site/2015/11/17/a39eccc4-8d67-11e5-ae1f-af46b7df8483_story.html?utm_term=.d04edca08650

ARE YOU AWARE OF SIMILAR LEGISLATION PREVIOUSLY INTRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA OR IN OTHER STATES? If so, please include the author, bill number, and outcome of the legislation:

List of related laws (California):

Gilroy legalized encampment proposal: http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/city_local_government/advocates-for-the-homeless-propose-legal-encampment/article_bcb2e2d0-7b5d-11e4-bc15-6fb482000728.html

Nevada County legalized encampment: http://www.theunion.com/news/local-news/advocate-pushes-for-legal-homeless-camp-in-nevada-county/

http://www.kcra.com/article/placerville-s-legal-homeless-camp-hopes-to-survive/6399059

Other States:

Seattle draft legislation: http://realchangenews.org/2013/05/29/proposal-legalize-homeless-encampments

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2014/09/17/city-council-has-majority-to-legalize-homeless-encampments

http://komonews.com/news/local/seattle-city-council-considers-plan-that-would-legalize-homeless-camping

Des Moines, Washington draft legislation:

http://www.desmoineswa.gov/index.aspx?NID=471

Portland encampment legalization law: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2016/02/this_is_charlie_hales_plan_for.html

PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY FINANCIAL IMPACTS (i.e., costs, savings, or revenue) YOU ANTICIPATE MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR PROPOSAL:

Each encampment would cost government, whether local, county or state, money, which would likely come from the general tax fund.

Some of this money would be offset by fees charged to users, as outlined in the proposal. Analysis will show that concomitant savings will occur in all jurisdictions from decreased need for policing, decreased blight on land and fewer calls from residents. The net effect on all jurisdictions should be positive, but the financial impact will be felt differently by each jurisdiction.

(AB 551, which gives tax incentives for turning vacant, often blighted, urban land into urban farms and gardens provides an interesting analogy.  It costs the counties (where it is enacted) property taxes for those properties which enroll in the program.  Administrative expenses are mostly offset by application fees, but may also cost the counties some money.  Police will see a big savings by not having to patrol the formerly blighted properties, although some of the problems may simply move elsewhere.  However, the police savings will not necessarily go into the same pot that the property taxes came out of – if financial management is not made then school districts, dependent upon property taxes, will often suffer.  The small enrollment in AB 551 means that we have not seen any meaningful effects yet, although some advocates worry about the possibilities.)

WHO DO YOU THINK WOULD SUPPORT THE BILL?

Homeless Advocates, Mental Health Professionals, Social Workers, Food Banks, Churches, Police Departments

WHO DO YOU THINK WOULD OPPOSE THE BILL?

Cities / League of California Cities, Homeowners groups (neighbors, NIMBY), Police Departments

Phoenix garden – rising from the soil

— submitted by Kris Jensen

In 2006 two permaculture students created the outline of what would become the Phoenix Garden on a barren and degraded seven-acre site at San Mateo County’s Youth Services Center (YSC). Under the patient leadership of Toni DeMarco, one of those students and a therapist at the YSC, the Garden finally began to take shape last year when we planted 100 fruit trees that created the foundation of a food forest that will be there for generations to come. The overarching goal of the Phoenix Garden is to transform the site into a resilient and regenerative permaculture oasis serving youth and families participating in court-ordered probation department programs, the foster care system, and families in need of mental health services.

You can be a part of this incredible project by volunteering at one of our regular workdays. In partnership with San Mateo County, the Silicon Valley Permaculture Guild manages a volunteer workday every third Saturday from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM where we get our hands dirty building out this vision based in the permaculture ethics of earth care, people care and sharing in our excess.

If this piques your interest and would like to join us, please contact Kris Jensen (krisxjensen@gmail.com) and look for announcements from Transition Palo Alto for an upcoming TPA workday. The garden is located at the San Mateo County Youth Services Center, 222 Paul Scannell Drive in San Mateo.